Home

  • The National Training Center

    This documentary is a bit dated, being from somewhere around 2000 or so, I’d guess based on the weapons, uniforms, and equipment.

    First formed in1980, the NTC was originally intended to give brigades a realistic taste of what they would face when battling a Soviet Motorized Rifle Regiment. As the threat has changed over the years, the threat presentation at NTC has evolved as well. During the height of the war in Iraq, BCTs rotating through would have a training experience highly tailored to their anticipated deployment to Iraq, complete with actors portraying tribal leaders, and mock urban environments that mirrored the location they were deploying to.

    But as the COIN emphasis of the Army has shifted with our much reduced presence in Iraq, the NTC has returned to its roots of major force on force training evolutions.

    The NTC was such a monumental success in training the heavy brigades of the Army that a second center, the Joint Training Readiness Center was established at Fort Chaffee, AR,  though later moved to Fort Polk, LA. And in Europe, the training area at Hohenfels became the Combat Maneuver Training Center, now known as Joint Multinational Training Center.

    Ideally, an Army BCT will go through a training cycle of about 18 months, starting with individual tasks, small team tasks, and progressing through squad, platoon, company and battalion level collective training, each training evolution building upon the lessons learned at the previous echelon. BCT level training would culminate with a rotation through one of the three training centers, followed by a major deployment, or period of readiness for contingency deployment. At the end of that cycle, the process starts again.

  • World of Warships- Grump Wagon Unleashes the Kraken

    Our buddy Grump Wagon took out the Clemson and went on a bit of a tear. Devastating Strike, Confederate, and the Kraken!

  • What Might Have Been: The Japanese Type 3 Chi-No Medium Tank

    Type3-01.dwsxip

    URR here.  The Type 3 Chi-no Medium Tank was the last word in Japanese armor during World War II.   It was the last tank remaining in production in 1945, and the only Japanese tank which was capable of posing any kind of threat to the US M4A1 Sherman.  However, due to shortages of gasoline and strategic materials (namely steel), and with an armaments industry largely in ruins, Japan could manage to produced fewer than 200 of the Type 3s.  None saw combat, but virtually the entire inventory was on Kyushu and Honshu awaiting the coming US invasion.  

    The design of the Type 3 was purpose-built to counter the US M4A1 Sherman, which was arriving in increasing numbers on Pacific battlefields beginning in 1943.  The Type 3's 75mm 38-caliber gun (also designated the Type 3) could penetrate the 76mm frontal armor of the M4A1 at 700 meters, and the side armor at 1,000 meters.  This represented a two-generation leap from the low-velocity 57mm and the medium-velocity 47mm guns equipping the vast majority of Japanese tanks, neither of which was particularly effective against the Sherman except at very close range.  

    Destroyed_Japanese_Type_95_Ha-Go_tank 6822547361_b92af865b4_b
    Japanese tanks were notoriously bad, with thin armor, limited mobility, and weak armament.  The Type 95 Light and Type 97 "Medium" Tanks were, by Western standards, all but useless against enemy armor.  They were, at best, moderately effective in the infantry support role, but were easy prey for the 37mm and 57mm US anti-tank guns, and utterly helpless against the Sherman's 75mm 40-caliber M3 main gun at any range.   

    3SHIKI

    The Type 3 weighed approximately 19.5 tons, and had a crew of 5.  The Mitsubishi engine and drive train were very reliable.  Unusually tall, at 9.5 feet, the high silhouette made the tank vulnerable to detection.  (The Sherman, at 8 feet, ten inches, shared this drawback.)  In the coastal plains of Kyushi and Honshu, far away from the concealing jungle, such a flaw would have been serious.  Top speed was 24 mph, but cross country capability would likely have been limited by a narrower tread and lower power-to-weight ratio than the American M4A1.  

    While the Type 3 represented a much more serious challenge to the Sherman, the vehicle was still markedly inferior to its US opponent.  The thickest armor, on the front plate, was just 50mm, and the side armor just 25mm.  The main gun of the M4A1 could penetrate the Type 3 front plate out to 2,000 meters, nearly three times the effective range of the Japanese main gun against the Sherman.   

    Despite its shortcomings, the Type 3 was far and away the best Japanese tank produced in any numbers during the war.  Had development started earlier, when it was clear the Type 95 and Type 97 were thoroughly obsolete, these machines could have made several island fights much more interesting.  

    It is believed only one example remains, outside the JGSDF Ordnance School in, Tsuchiura, Japan.

     

  • Fort MacArthur

    So, we popped in to Fort MacArthur Days yesterday.  Fort MacArthur, named for LTG Arthur MacArthur, was the primary coastal defense installation guarding access to Los Angeles harbor, and is sited on the northern side of the harbor in San Pedro. Initially purchased in 1888, Fort MacArthur was formally opened in 1914, and the first big gun batteries were installed in 1917. It would be further updated for service in World War II, and after the war would serve as a Nike Ajax and later Nike Hercules installation. It would close in the late 1970s, though a small portion of the base still serves as housing for personnel from Los Angeles Air Force Base.

    The Fort MacArthur Days is primarily a World War II reenactment, though there are reenactors ranging from modern times all the way back to the Roman Legions.

    20160709_12480420160709_12540620160709_12541520160709_12542320160709_12545320160709_12552220160709_12563620160709_12572520160709_12591220160709_125914(0)20160709_12591420160709_12593920160709_12594020160709_12595320160709_13002820160709_13004620160709_13032820160709_13051920160709_13064620160709_13070920160709_13072520160709_13154220160709_13291720160709_13305920160709_13390020160709_13425320160709_13433720160709_13442220160709_13595720160709_14111520160709_14114620160709_14345220160709_14350120160709_14352020160709_14401120160709_14405220160709_14420120160709_14421120160709_14430520160709_14432520160709_14433620160709_14454620160709_14463120160709_14464320160709_14472920160709_15050020160709_15052020160709_150524

  • Faceplant

    //platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The old ALICE pack had a quick release mechanism on the shoulder straps so you could quickly drop your rucksack when you made contact with the enemy.

    I was humping an especially heavy ruck on time along a very, very narrow ridgeline in Hawaii. And one of my shoulder straps decided on its own to quickly disconnect. The rapid shift of the weight of the rucksack actually pulled me off my feet, and sent me tumbling down the ridge. The guy behind me said it looked like God himself had reached down and flicked me off the trail.

  • The Tanks are Coming!

    Not often you get to see an M2.

    We’ve been at a WW2 reenactment at Fort MacArthur today, so pics of that later.

  • Oops.

    WASHINGTON  — A Delta Air Lines jetliner with 130 passengers on board landed at the wrong airport in South Dakota Thursday evening, said a spokesman for the National Transportation Safety Board, which is investigating the incident.

    The Delta A320 landed at Ellsworth Air Force Base at 8:42 p.m. Central Time Thursday, when its destination was an airport in Rapid City, board spokesman Peter Knudson said Friday.

    Ellsworth is about 10 miles due north of Rapid City Regional Airport. The two airports have runways that are oriented nearly identically to the compass, from northwest to southeast.

    via www.airforcetimes.com

    On the other hand, the runways at Ellsworth are probably longer than at Rapid City.

  • World of Warships- Wide Open Wickes

    Chuck and I have a bit of fun on the Ocean Map in the Tier III US destroyer, the Wickes.

    By no means did I play a particularly good game here, but I sure had a lot of fun doing it.

  • Just how close can you get to going in the drink?

    Last March, 8 sailors were injured when an arresting wire aboard the USS Eisenhower parted during an attempted arrested landing by an E-2 Hawkeye.

    After the cross deck pendant parted, the Hawkeye staggered off the waist, and settled toward the water. I’m pretty sure all hands were certain it was going to crash.

  • Pershing Missile

    After Word War II, with the capture of German V-2 rocket stocks, and with the assistance of German scientists brought to the US under Operation Paperclip, the US Army began an aggressive program to study and build its own ballistic missile systems. And as soon as nuclear weapons were designed that were more compact than the Fat Man and Little Boy types used in World War II, of course the Army looked to integrate them as well.

    For much of the 1950s and 1960s, it was simply assumed any war with the Soviet Union would involve nuclear weapons, and thousands of weapons were deployed at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels.

    The Army and the newly established US Air Force both vied for the ballistic missile mission, with the Air Force eventually winning the role. But the Army was allowed to pursue short and intermediate range weapons, eventually fielding the Corporal and Sargent short ranged ballistic missile systems, and the Redstone intermediate range ballistic missile.

    The Redstone, far better known for lofting early Mercury space capsules on sub orbital flights than for any battlefield efficiency, was quickly seen as far too cumbersome to be a practical weapon, and the Army looked to replace it with something more advanced than what was essentially a warmed over V-2.

    Working with Martin Marietta and Thiokol, the new missile was named Pershing, in honor of General John J. Pershing.

    The MGM-31 Pershing missile was a two stage solid propellant missile with inertial guidance. It threw a W50 nuclear warhead to a maximum range of 400 miles. The W50 had a selective yield of 60, 200, or 400 kilotons. It was, for its time, a rather accurate missile, with a Circular Error Probable (CEP) of 400 meters.*

    The missile was maneuvered during flight by a complex system of both aerodynamic fins and thrust vectoring. Range was controlled by jettisoning the second stage at the desired time. As solid rocket motors can’t be shut off once started, a complex system of exhaust vents at the forward portion of the second stage would be fired to back the stage away from the warhead section. From there, the warhead would continue on a purely ballistic path to either impact or airburst at the target.

    The warhead section also carried the inertial navigation system and the guidance computer. In the original Pershing missile, this was an analog computer.

    Pershing was a highly mobile missile system. The missile itself was carried on a tracked Transporter/Erector/Launcher, or TEL. Along with the TEL, another tracked vehicle, the warhead transport, carried the warhead itself, as well as carrying the azimuth laying equipment. Two theodolites were used to lay the missile upon the correct azimuth before launch.  A third tracked vehicle carried a Programmer Test Station, which input the required guidance information and performed missile checkout functions. This third vehicle also carried the Power Station, a gas turbine generator which provided prime power for both the missile, and the other equipment of the firing platoon. The final vehicle of the firing platoon carried the TRC-80 Radio Terminal Set to provide secure long range voice and teletype communications to the battery headquarters. The TRC-80 was interesting in that it used an inflatable dish antenna. Remember, this was developed in the late 1950s, early 1960s, when there simply were no satellite communications. Instead, the TRC-80 used the dish either in a direct path, or through tropospheric scatter.

    One Pershing battalion was stationed in the United States, primarily for training and support, and three battalions were deployed to West Germany. In addition, the Luftwaffe fielded two wings of Pershing.  As with other nuclear weapon systems, the nuclear warheads remained under US control.

    By the mid 1960s, improvements in electronics meant the Pershing was in need of an update. The analog guidance system, as well as the analog PTS were replaced by digital systems, giving much better reliability.  The updated missile was the Pershing Ia, with the original Pershing being retroactively renamed Pershing I.

    Importantly, Pershing Ia was much faster to put into operation, and after a series of operational tests, the battalions in West Germany began standing Quick Reaction Alert. That gave the theater commander the ability to conduct deep strikes against Soviet forces in the event of a sudden attack, even if weather or other circumstances would have grounded tactical airpower. Indeed, because of its very high mobility, and ability to move rapidly between a series of launch points, the Pershing system was seen as more survivable than tactical airpower, and often faster to respond.

    Eventually, the firing platoon expanded from one to three missiles, with one PTS/PS supporting all three. The artillery brigade that commanded the three firing battalions added a separate Infantry battalion to provide security to the firing platoon when deployed to launch sites.

    In 1976, the Automatic Reference System was added, which meant that firing sites no longer need be pre-surveyed.

    The equipment for all the launch systems was later removed from the tracked vehicles, and mounted on Ford trucks (or German trucks for the two Luftwaffe wings) which, though slightly reducing their off road mobility, greatly increased their overall mobility over the extensive German road network, particularly since they were no longer tied to pre surveyed launch points.

    At about this time, facing Soviet deployment of large numbers of intermediate ranged weapons, the US decided to greatly increase its nuclear deterrent in Western Europe. This would involve the deployment of about 400 Ground Launched Cruise Missiles (a truck launched, nuclear armed version of the Navy’s Tomahawk missile) to be operated by the US Air Force, and a new missile to replace the aging Pershing.

    Because of the SALT II treaty, no new launchers could be introduced into West Germany. Accordingly, any new missile would have to be capable of using the existing launchers, though they could be modified.

    The new Pershing II, again built by Martin Marietta and Thiokol, was visually almost indistinguishable from the earlier missile. But its range had been extended from 400 miles to 900 miles.

    More importantly, it was the first Maneuvering Reentry Vehicle equipped weapon. At the front of the missile was a terrain mapping radar. The radar would map the target area during reentry, and compare it to digitally stored radar maps in the guidance section, and maneuver until both pictures were correlated. This technique gave Pershing II a vastly improved CEP of about 100 feet.  Inertial guidance would still be used for the boost phase of the flight, or if the radar failed during reentry.

    Because it was so much more accurate, the Pershing II needed a much smaller warhead, and so was fitted with the W85, with a selectable yield of between 5 and 50 kilotons.

    Fielding of the Pershing II began in 1983, amidst massive protest in West Germany (protests that the Soviet Union quietly but thoroughly penetrated and supported).

    Still, the Soviet Union saw itself in an arms race over intermediate ranged weapons that it simply couldn’t afford to participate in.

    In 1987, the Soviet Union and the United States agreed to the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, which led to the withdrawal of all INF weapons and their destruction. The last Pershing IIs were removed and destroyed in 1991. Though West Germany was not a signatory of the treaty, they unilaterally agreed to withdraw and destroy their Pershing Ia inventory.

     

    *CEP- If you drew a circle of 400 meters around the desired impact point, 50% of missiles fired would land within the circle.