-
Army To Charge Ebola Quarantine Time Against Annual Leave
VICENZA, Italy — American troops continue to be quarantined after returning from missions to aid the Ebola crisis in Liberia and will be charged a day of leave for each day of “controlled monitoring,” Army officials confirmed Monday.
The move is in response to troops lounging around their barracks not doing anything but taking their own temperature, exercising basic sanitation protocols, and washing cigarette butts through chlorine washes.
According to the commander of U.S. Army forces in Africa, Maj. Gen. Darryl Williams, quarantined troops have had good morale with internet access and phones, Williams told reporters, a situation that simply wasn’t an acceptable climate for soldiers to be monitored in.
“In order to reinforce traditional Army values we retroactively began to charge soldiers leave days while they are being monitored,” said Williams. “The Sergeant Major nearly had an aneurism when he found out they were sitting around all day not doing anything. They can’t just be having fun like it’s some kind of frat house hosting Halo tournaments, and daily pizza parties. We had to react appropriately.”
via Army To Charge Ebola Quarantine Time Against Annual Leave.
-
"We are here from Mexico and came by train"
NBC News tells us that ISIS propaganda leaflets have been found near Marine Corps Base Quantico, VA. Which also happens to be the location of the FBI Academy. The leaflets reportedly announce in Arabic that “We are here from Mexico and came by train”.
But I am sure there isn’t anything to worry about. In fact, I am positive that they are counterfeit. Why?
Because the folks at DHS have already told us that suggestions that ISIS terrorists have crossed the deliberately wide-open Southwestern US Border are “categorically false”. And that “DHS continues to have no credible intelligence to suggest terrorist organizations are actively plotting to cross the southwest border”
That makes me feel better.
Because the chances of Ebola reaching US shores is “unlikely”. Al-Nusrah Islamic extremists are “moderate”. The Benghazi attacks were not terrorism. The IRS scandal was only low-level employees in Cincinnati. Fast and Furious was started under Bush. The Obamas didn’t know about Jeremiah Wright’s racist, anti-Semitic rants. The biggest terrorist threat to the US is from white male Veterans who believe in the Constitution. Global warming exists and is Man’s fault. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. The unemployment rate is dropping. We can trust Iran not to build nukes. This Administration isn’t anti-Israel. The CIA didn’t tell the President about ISIS. Voter ID laws are unpopular. No lobbyists hold policy jobs. This will be the most transparent Presidency ever.
So however could I doubt Jeh Johnson and his razor-sharp spokespeople at DHS when they tell me something such as terrorists crossing our open borders is “categorically false”? It’s not like Johnson’s skin color played any part in being hired as DHS Secretary, because race is never an issue with this White House.
These leaflets may be forgeries, and represent nothing more than someone’s idea of a prank. Then again, they may be the genuine article. Whatever, the one thing we can count on from the Obama Administration is full disclosure of the truth, regardless of any embarrassment that it might cause. It isn’t as if they would lie to the American people, would they?
Afghanistan, Around the web, Defense, guns, history, Iran, iraq, islam, israel, Libya, marines, nuclear weapons, obama, Politics, Syria, terrorism, Uncategorized, veterans, war, weapons -
Load HEAT- Andrea Roth
Sure, you probably recall Andrea Roth from Rescue Me, but are you forgetting her role on the TV series RoboCop?
-
Update on Spaceship Two.
Our “expert” in the previous post warning about the rocket might wish she’d waited a few hours.

-
Virgin Galactic and why Clickbait headlines drive me crazy.
Los Angeles (AFP) – A rocket science safety expert on Sunday said Virgin Galactic “ignored” safety warnings in the years leading up to the deadly crash of its spacecraft in California, as investigators hunted for clues to accident’s cause.
Carolynne Campbell, a rocket propulsion expert with the Netherlands-based International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety, said she could not speculate on the cause of Friday’s crash without “all the data.”
However, she said multiple warnings had been issued to Virgin since 2007, when three engineers died testing a rocket on the ground.
“Based on the work we’ve done, including me writing a paper on the handling of nitrous oxide, we were concerned about what was going on at Virgin Galactic,” she told AFP.
via Virgin ‘ignored’ space safety warnings before crash: expert – Yahoo News.
In the wake of the crash of Virgin Galactic’s Spaceship Two, presumably due to a malfunction in its rocket motor, there is an awful lot of speculation, and of course, “experts” have to pop up and give their input.
And of course, people who read this article have to jump to the conclusion that VG was negligent or otherwise at fault.
But here’s the thing- based on this article, we have no information that would genuinely inform that opinion.
Ms. Campbell may well be a genuine expert on rocket safety. Or she may just work for a storefront. We simply don’t know based on the article.
Further, we have no way of knowing if the warnings she supposedly sent to VG were in any way relevant to the design, manufacture, and testing of the VG hybrid rocket system.
The NTSB will likely take a year or more to conclude its investigation. Real experts will wait to examine it in detail before pronouncing judgment.
-
Voter Fraud in New Mexico: Voter Turned Away After Illegal Voted as Him; Lack of Voter ID Law Blamed | PUNDIT PRESS
An impostor illegally used a New Mexico’s man vote three days before the actual person came in to vote. The incident occurred in Rio Arriba County. When the real person came to cast his ballot, he was at first turned away, being told that he had already voted.
Only when the real person contested, saying he had not in fact voted, did election officials review their files and compare the signatures they had on record and the one signed by whoever voted three days earlier.
The signatures did not match. Why the officials did not check this in the first place has not been stated, and required voter ID laws were not in place.
Public polling has consistently shown that roughly 75-80 percent of the public supports voter ID laws. The ONLY reason to oppose voter ID laws is to enable fraud such as this.
-
Divorce, Soldier suicide, and child custody- a nexus?
Terrence Popp gave an interview as an aside at the International Conference on Men’s Issues regarding soldier suicides with regard to divorce and child custody battles.
I’m single, no kids, so my experience is second hand. But a soldier facing divorce has the deck stacked against him. He’s almost always in a location away from his extended support group. That is, having joined the military, his duty station is usually away from the friends and family he grew up with. His chain of command is likely not terribly supportive. It’s usually not actively against him, but consider that his company commander joined the service with visions of martial trappings, not marital counseling. Coupled with a widespread misunderstanding of what it means to serve in society and the courts, on top of a family court system already predisposed to side with the woman, that imposes incredible stress on the man. Many, many men react badly. Guys who have a predisposition to taking action to solving problems suddenly take actions that are unhelpful. I think this is an area where more research, an unbiased look at causality, would be very helpful.
-
Army Cadet suffers burns in blowtorch attack after selling poppies
An Army Cadet was blasted in the face with a makeshift blowtorch in an unprovoked attack after selling poppies for Remembrance Sunday.
The 15-year-old boy was waiting at a bus stop at 6pm on Saturday evening in Manchester city centre when a man approached him with an aerosol can and lighter and sprayed him with lit fumes.
The cadet, who was wearing his camouflaged uniform, suffered minor burns to his face and singed hairs in his face and right forearm, Greater Manchester Police said. He and his family are in “total shock”.
via Army Cadet suffers burns in blowtorch attack after selling poppies – Telegraph.
You’ll have to click through the link to play “guess the attackers ethnicity.”
-
On Mechanization and Combined Arms.
While the tank was invented and initially fielded during World War I, World War II was really the first conflict to feature large scale armor formations, and put the theory of the tank into practice. Considerable thought had gone into the best doctrine for the use of the tank between the wars. Some doctrines were more successful than others. In the US during the interwar years, there were two primary schools of thought. Cavalry saw the tank as a replacement for the horse*, a means of rapid movement on the battlefield to turn flanks, raid the enemy rear, and exploit breakthroughs. Tanks should be light and fast. The tank would be the decisive arm, and all others should support it. The Infantry primarily saw the tank as a direct fire support asset for the rifleman. Tanks should be slow and heavy. The Infantry would be the decisive arm, and all others should support it.
That’s a gross oversimplification of the schools of thought, but sufficient for now. But a funny thing happened on the way to victory in World War II- it turned out, both major schools of thought were wrong.
The original US table for an armored division had two regiments of tanks, and one regiment of Armored Infantry, mounted on half-track personnel carriers. But it quickly became apparent that the “heavy” division was unwieldy, and, more critically, lacked enough infantrymen. Aside from the 2nd and 3rd Armored Divisions, eventually all US armored divisions in World War II would adopt a “light” table, with one regiment of tanks, and one regiment of armored infantry. In effect, the ratio of tanks to infantry went from 2-1 to 1-1. And by the end of the war, it wasn’t uncommon for an armored division to be augmented with extra infantry battalions, or even a regiment from a regular infantry division, in essence giving a ratio of 1-2.
Today we think of the tank as the ultimate tank killer. But prior to World War II, and indeed, through most of the war, US doctrine held that the very last thing tanks should be used for was killing tanks. That’s a large part of why the M4 Sherman was initially fielded with a rather anemic 75mm gun. The gun was quite suited for firing on bunkers and pillboxes. It’s rather poor performance against armor wasn’t thought to be a major handicap. By the end of the war, both the thinking on the best means of killing tanks, and the main armament had changed.
After the war, the rough numbers of infantry units to armor units was generally maintained at around 1-1. Armored Infantry eventually gave way to what we today call mechanized infantry. Carriers for the infantry have evolved from the half track through the M75 and M59 Armored Personnel Carriers, to the long serving M113 to todays M2 Bradley family.
In whatever vehicle they used, mechanized Infantry formations were always expected to operate alongside tank formations, with each arm supporting the other. Both armored and mechanized infantry divisions contained a balanced mix of tank and mech infantry units.
The fielding of the Bradley family, heavy on firepower, but light on numbers of actual infantrymen, made sense in western Europe when the US faced a Soviet Union with massive numbers of tanks and other armored vehicles, including thousands of BMP fighting vehicles and and BTR armored personnel carriers. Interestingly, the Soviets too had balanced formations of infantry and armor, though their mix of “motorized rifle” formations had a rough mix of one BMP formation (heavy on firepower, lighter on dismount infantry) to two BTR formations (light on firepower, heavy on dismount infantry).
The US saw the Bradley as needed to whittle down the numbers of Soviet vehicles. The problem was, the compromises needed to mount both an automatic cannon and the TOW missile launcher meant that something had to give, and that was the number of dismount infantrymen per vehicle. Whereas for many years the rifle squad was 11 or twelve men, eventually it shrank to 9 men. But in Bradley units, each Bradley could only deploy six, or maybe seven dismounts. And that’s under the cheery assumption that the unit was at 100% strength.
While that was generally acceptable for western Europe facing the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany (GSFG), for other theaters, that left a dearth of dismounts available for those missions that require large numbers of troops actually on the ground.
That lack of actual numbers of infantry, when history has shown that large numbers of infantry are required on the combined arms battlefield, was part of the impetus for the introduction of the Stryker Brigade Combat Team. The Stryker is often belittled in comparison to both the Bradley, and the M113. But the Stryker is not a replacement for either. Rather, it is a recognition that earlier light infantry units simply didn’t have the operational mobility to move around the battlefield. The weapon of the Stryker BCT isn’t the Stryker vehicle, it is the dismount rifleman.
No real point to all of this. Just putting some random thoughts down.
*Of course, not all Cavalry officers thought this. Many right up until about 1940 still saw the horse as a viable weapon of war.
-
Bronco Marketing
I love these old marketing videos.
