Home

  • Why arming military recruiters after Chattanooga is so legally complicated – The Washington Post

    “Arming DoD personnel (i.e., administrative, assessment, or inspection, not regularly engaged in or directly supervising security or law enforcement activities) shall be limited to missions or threats and the immediate need to protect DoD assets or persons’ lives,” the directive continues. “DoD Components have the discretion to keep designated staff personnel qualified and available or on call to perform duties.”

    That directive can be changed by the Pentagon or adapted to suit its current needs. It has similarities to the 1992 version issued during President George H.W. Bush’s administration, and an earlier one released in 1969, Henderson said. That would appear to give Carter leeway to arm more service members at military installations on federal property like Fort Hood. But it’s unclear what the military can do for recruiters. They commonly work out of commercially leased office space, and must adhere to state laws when it comes to carrying weapons in public.

    via Why arming military recruiters after Chattanooga is so legally complicated – The Washington Post.

    I do not see where state law impinges on the supremacy of federal law here, provided recruiters and other service personnel are carrying government issued weapons in the performance of their duties.

    By Mr. Lamothe’s reasoning, the troops engaged in training in Jade Helm or its smaller cousin Robin Sage would be operating under the auspices of Texas, North Carolina, and various other state firearms laws. That simply isn’t the case.

    Furthermore, while recruiting stations are typically commercially leased properties, they are considered as federal installations, just as any other federal government offices using leased property.

    There are issues to work out. But state laws have nothing to do with it.

     

  • The Sea Knight was pretty maneuverable.

    While the phamed CH-46 “Phrog” is gone from US Marine Corps service, it should be noted that the basic Boeing Vertol Model 107 design was also a successful export item. Among international operators were Japan, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, several commercial operators, and of course, Sweden, who used the Sea Knight, known to them as the HKP 4, mostly in the Search and Rescue role. Here we see a Swedish Sea Knight put through its paces for an airshow.

  • Raytheon: To Print a Missile – Raytheon research points to 3-D printing for tomorrow’s technology

    via Raytheon: To Print a Missile – Raytheon research points to 3-D printing for tomorrow’s technology.

  • Navy in the news.

    First up, earlier in the week, during an exericise, the USS Sullivans launched an SM-2 missile from her Mk41 Vertical Launch system. Almost immediately after clearing the launcher, the missile exploded.

    A Raytheon SM-2 Block IIIA guided missile explodes over USS The Sullivans during a training exercise on July 18, 2015. US Navy Photo obtained by USNI News

     

    Given that the missile had no warhead, it’s virtually a certainty that the solid rocket motor failed, and rather spectacularly at that! I’ve never heard of a similar failure of an SM-2. It could be simply due to aging, or a manufacturing defect. One suspects the Navy is going to take a close look at  a lot of other SM-2 Block III missiles.

    I have, on the other hand, seen a Royal Navy Sea Dart fail rather spectacularly on launch.

    ——-

    The US Navy is constructing a massive simulation capability at NAS Fallon, home of Naval Strike & Air Warfare Center. But more than being a collection of 80 simulators, it will also be integrating cruiser Combat Information Center sims, and integrating with genuine aircraft conducting real flights.

    The Navy has begun to build a next generation training center that will pair up to 80 fighter, reconnaissance aircraft and ship simulators with live fliers in a massive environment that blends the real world with the virtual.

    Navy director of air warfare Rear Adm. Mike Manazir told USNI News on July 16 that the Navy is working towards opening an Air Defense Strike Group Facility at Naval Air Station Fallon in Nevada in January 2016 and upgrading it to an Integrated Training Facility by 2020, which would represent a fundamental leap forward in live, virtual and constructive (LVC) training.

    Today, the Navy can conduct live-constructive training, in which a live pilot up in the air reacts to computer-generated scenarios, and virtual-constructive training, in which a person in a simulator reacts to computer-generated scenarios. But connecting a pilot in the air with a pilot in a simulator to operate in the same constructive environment – a full LVC event – is a real technical challenge.

    The big benefit is that you can construct very large scale scenarios, and tailor them to any location in the world. That is, it will give a more genuine representation of actual operations that current scenarios.

    ——-

    Not exactly a Navy only story, but Lockheed is looking at ways to use sensors and datalinks to increase real time targeting capability.

    A high-flying Lockheed Martin U-2 spy plane has enabled a mission control station to dynamically re-target a simulated Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), using data passed from an F-22 Raptor over the deserts of Southern California in a recent flight trial.

    During the tests, targeting data was passed from the F-22 to a ground station via an L-3 Communications modem on the U-2, says Scott Winstead, Lockheed Martin’s head of strategic development for the U-2 programme. This allowed the ground station to re-target the LRASM surrogate, essentially a cruise missile mission systems flown on a business jet.

    In addition, the U-2 was able to translate and pass data between the F-22 and a Boeing F-18 Hornet during the series of flights, which took place in June. The tests were designed to evaluate new US Air Force open mission system (OMS) standards using a Skunk Works product called Enterprise OMS.

  • Hustlers. Not the fast jet kind.

    We post a lot of cruise videos from the Hornet crowd. But possibly the most beloved planes in the carrier air wing are the fat, ugly C-2A Greyhouds, because they bring the mail.

  • Chattanooga- They fought back

    Well, that’s interesting. In contravention to regulation and federal law, at least two servicemembers, including the commanding officer, were in possession of weapons, and fought back against the Islamist terrorist who attacked both a recruiting station and NOSC Chattanooga. During his assault which killed four Marines and one Sailor, at least one Marine carried a Glock pistol, and the NOSC commander, LCDR Timothy White possessed a weapon, and exchanged fire with the assailant.

    Per the New York Times:

    Chat

    Pistols versus an AK style rifle and shotgun isn’t a fair fight, but it’s far better than nothing.

    The question now is will the chain of command honor LCDR White for his valor, or denounce him for violation of regulations?

  • About Armed Civilians at Recruiting Centers

    In the wake of the Chattanooga shooting, we’re seeing several places where well meaning civilians have taken upon themselves the duty of standing guard over recruiting stations.

    While we admire the intent, the fact is, it will have some unintended consequences. US Army Recruiting Command has issued guidance to the field regarding this.  Via TAH.

    Subject: USAREC Policy – Armed citizens at recruiting centers ATO’s,

    Situation: The USAREC COC has received reports from two Brigade ATOs, social media and TV coverage that law abiding armed citizens are standing outside of our recruiting centers in an attempt to safeguard our recruiters.

    Execution:

    1) Recruiters will not acknowledge the presence or interact with these civilians. If questioned by these alleged concerned citizens; be polite, professional, and terminate the conversation immediately and report the incident to local law enforcement and complete USAREC Form 958 IAW USAREC 190-4 (SIR)

    2) Do not automatically assume these concerned citizens are there to help.
    Immediately report IAW USAREC 190-4 (Suspicious Behavior)

    3) Immediately report any civilians loitering near the Station/Center to local police if the recruiter feels threatened. Ensure your recruiters’ clearly articulate to local police the civilian may be armed and in possession of a conceal/carry permit. Ensure recruiters include any information provided by local police in their SIR reporting the incident.

    4) Ensure all station commanders implement FPCON Charlie 6 (Lock and secure entry points) addressed in previous email.

    5) I’m sure the citizens mean well, but we cannot assume this in every case and we do not want to advocate this behavior.

    *** The timely and accurate submission of 958s (SIR) is imperative to track these incidents and elicit support from TRADOC, ARNORTH and NORTHCOM.

    As with Jonn, I agree that this is a mostly reasonable policy. The Army cannot endorse the actions of the citizens. Nor can they simply assume they mean well. Furthermore, should some untoward action occur, say, these citizens mistakenly take another American for a threat and engage them unlawfully, it is imperative that it be known that the Army had nothing to do with it.

    Unfortunately, FPCON Charlie 6 (Force Protection Condition) basically shuts down the recruiting station. And therein lies a problem, as the sine qua non of recruiting is engaging with the public.

    While informing local law enforcement, and filing SIRs makes sense, it also increases the odds of an unhappy encounter between these citizens and LEOs.

    I think as a first step, USAREC might have directed station commanders to share this guidance with those citizens who are attempting to both provide a service and made a statement. One presumes that senior NCOs have enough judgment to discern the likelihood that a party of armed citizens outside have no ill intent, and sharing this guidance would cause them to reconsider if their actions were truly in the recruiter’s best interests. And if they choose to continue their vigil, well, provided they are within the bounds of the law, that is their right.

  • Morning Links

    CIMSEC had a vision of the future. Unfortunately, it was a vision of how the OPM hack might be exploited. Cross reference names from OPM against the data breach at Adult Friend Finder, and now, Ashley Madison, and you start to generate some real penetration agent leads.

    —–

    Jade Helm

    Yeah, it’s a Dem group. OTOH, they’ve got a point. Lotta people flipping out what shouldn’t.

  • Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans

    Retired general and former Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday called for World War II-style internment camps to be revived for “disloyal Americans.” In an interview with MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts in the wake of the mass shooting in Chatanooga, Tennessee, Clark said that during World War II, “if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.”

    He called for a revival of internment camps to help combat Muslim extremism, saying, “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”

    via Wesley Clark Calls for Internment Camps for “Radicalized” Americans.

    There’s a sad strain of senior officers that forget that the constraints on liberty imposed by the military life  do not, and should not, translate into civil society.  GEN Clark has never seemed to grasp that. His call for camps for the radicalized flies in the face of the principles of the Republic. Of course, it also complies nicely with the totalitarian strain of the Democratic party, such as the draconian restrictions imposed on freedoms by Wilson during World War I and the Roosevelt internment camps of World War II. *

    Do we have a problem with radicalized Muslims in America? Yes, yes we do. But as awful as the recent slaughter in Chattanooga was, and the related attacks and attempts in the years since 9/11 have been, we must also recognize that it is in fact, a fairly small problem.

    That is not to say that we must ignore the threat of these Sudden Jihad Syndrome attacks. But dealing with the issue doesn’t call for the round up large swaths of the Muslim population, either.  Indeed, it would seem to us that such an attempt would likely serve as a catalyst to actually radicalize any number of young Muslim men.

    The very best thing Clark could do to salvage his reputation is to fade into obscurity. And maybe read the Constitution for once.

     

    *Granted, the GOP wasn’t without sin in those cases, but nor did they lead the charge.

  • World’s Most Sophisticated Bomb Ready for Production | Defense News: Aviation International News

    The tri-mode seeker includes a semi-active laser, a millimeter-wave radar and an uncooled imaging infrared seeker. Some other “smart” bombs have dual-mode guidance, but Raytheon officials are not aware of a competing weapon with three guidance options. The predecessor SDB I offered only GPS guidance to fixed targets and did not contain the dual-band two-way datalink of the SDB II. The first version was also heavier, with a necessarily larger warhead that did not feature the multi-effects shaped-charge/blast-fragmentation warhead of the SDB II. The second version is also smart enough to sort, categorize and prioritize targets.

    Despite the sophistication, the SDB II is “affordable,” according to Sweetman. U.S. Air Force assistant acquisition secretary Dr. William LaPlante said recently that the cost per round will be about $115,000, some $65,000 below the goal set when the SDB II entered development five years ago. Raytheon has managed its workforce well and controlled costs, he said.

    via World’s Most Sophisticated Bomb Ready for Production | Defense News: Aviation International News.

    The original Small Diameter Bomb, the GBU-39, in service for the last decade or so, was really rather revolutionary, among the first weapons built from the ground up to capitalize on GPS technology. It was a dandy little tool for Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses or SEAD.  Against a near peer threat, SEAD will be critical to seizing and maintaining air superiority. The problem is, many modern threat air defenses are highly mobile, and the SDB I can’t attack mobile targets.

    SDB II addresses this at a surprisingly low cost. That $115,000 covers the tri-mode seeker (and it will still have a GPS capability as well), the sophisticated warhead, and the airframe. Even at double the price, it would be a fairly impressive exercise in cost control.

    Another benefit is that the Air Force has shown a willingness to take a system that works in one program, and leverage it across multiple programs. For instance, the Imaging Infrared Seeker used in the AGM-65D Maverick missile went on to be used in quite a few other weapon systems. Almost surely we’ll see this option used with the tri-mode seeker adapted to other weapons. An immediate though it that a kit to adapt the Mk80 series bombs much as with LGBs and JDAMs will likely follow.