-
Joint billet requirements, chain of command under review
Defense Secretary Ash Carter has launched a review of the landmark 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act that has defined military careers and organizational structure for decades, a Pentagon spokesman said Tuesday.
“The secretary feels (it) is important to take a look at the department and the structure right now within the DoD and to make sure that we’re doing things as efficiently as possible,” said Peter Cook, Carter’s primary spokesman.“This is something that he’s initiated here within the department itself, to take a hard look at … whether or not things could be done differently in the spirit of Goldwater-Nichols and the changes that resulted from that many years ago,” Cook said at a news briefing.
Source: Joint billet requirements, chain of command under review
There’s a long, long list of things to criticize Ash Carter for. This, however, is not one of them.
Goldwaters-Nichols was a needed reform. But with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the justification for the organization it brought collapsed as well. But primarily through bureaucratic inertia, the regional CoCom structure just kept going. Which, it did make a certain amount of sense. For instance, when Desert Storm popped up, CentCom, the regional combatant commander for the Middle East, simply deployed from its Tampa Bay headquarters to the field in Saudi Arabia. An existing unified chain of command was already in place, with Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Special Operations subordinate commanders already assigned. All the organization needed was to be filled out with troop units, first from XVIII Airborne Corps, and then later from VII Corps.
Where the G-N framework started to collapse was in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq. The armed services were already fighting in Afghanistan. And suddenly, CentCom found itself fighting two completely unrelated wars. No one commander could reasonably be expected to focus sufficiently to do well in both. So subordinate commanders were placed in each theater. Essentially, rather than doubling the size of the headquarters troops for the wars, it instead tripled them, as both Iraq and Afghanistan got an in-country headquarters, and certainly, CentCom wasn’t about to shrink, what with its role supervising both the subordinate staffs! Since then, the pattern has been set- any time there is a deployment, rather than the CoCom leading it in his region, and entire Joint Task Force unified headquarters is stood up and deployed, subordinate to the CoCom. It is essentially a duplication of effort.
And then there’s the Joint billet requirement. To reduce interservice parochialism, the requirement is that every officer has to serve time in a joint billet. Well, the problem with parochialism was mostly over how the budget pie got sliced. And the fact is, the Joint billet requirement hasn’t had any effect on that issue.
What is has done is drive a requirement for a lot of Joint billets, whether they do a real job or not, because clear down at the O-5 and O-6 level, to be “fair” to the promotion prospects of every single officer, they have to have a tour.
That’s pretty stupid in that it drives up the size of useless headquarters staffs, and takes officers away from their primary career field for no good reason. There is plenty of time at the O-7/O-8 paygrades to serve in a joint billet, where service integration really starts anyway.
So there’s great room for improvement over G-N, and we hope Carter looks carefully, but quickly at how best to change from an outdated, inefficient system.
One thing to consider. With the shift in focus in the Army from a divisional based organization to the Brigade Combat Team model is that the Army has been trying to design its division and corps headquarters to serve not merely as higher elements to deployed BCTs, but as command nodes for unified (that is, all services) command.
For instance, in the current deployment of Operation Inherent Resolve, based in Iraq and fighting ISIS, a corps headquarters might be deployed to serve as the JTF headquarters, with Air Force and Navy/Marine Corps and Special Operations subordinate commands attaching in a “plug and play” manner. The corps headquarters is already robustly equipped with the staff, intel, logistics, and communications to fulfill this role, and also to integrate with non-DoD agencies, such as the host nation, other US departments, and some NGOs.
-
Army to stop putting Social Security numbers on dog tags
Soldiers’ Social Security numbers will no longer be part of their dog tags, the Army announced Tuesday.The change, which some have argued is long overdue, is the first update to the ubiquitous identification tags in more than 40 years.A soldier’s Social Security number will be replaced by a 10-digit, randomly-generated number. The change will be implemented on an as-needed basis, Michael Klemowski, Soldiers Programs branch chief at Army Human Resources Command, said in a statement released by the Army.
Source: Army to stop putting Social Security numbers on dog tagsFinally!
It’s long been an annoyance that, while everyone tells you to keep your Social Security Account Number secure, the Army has, pretty much since 1973, I think, used it as your service number. It’s on your ID card, your dog tags, your service records, training records, rifle qualification score sheet, and pretty much every other document that touches on your Army career. And let’s be blunt, while that information is in fact Personally Identifying Information (PII) and supposed to be subject to safeguard, very often, the paperwork is absolutely unsecured.
Guys, how many of you recall being asked “Last four?”
-
Know your enemy- The Islamic State
Marine Corps University’s* Center for Advanced Operational Cultural Learning put together an excellent presentation describing how ISIS came to be, what it is, and how it operates. It is your required reading for the day.
Thanks to the reader who tipped us off.
-
Singapore Approves U.S. Surveillance Flights | Foreign Policy
Singapore is granting the United States permission to fly sophisticated surveillance aircraft out of its territory to better monitor China’s island-building in the South China Sea, Foreign Policy has learned.The defense agreement to be unveiled Monday reflects Singapore’s concerns over China’s assertive stance on territorial disputes. It also points to a broader trend among countries in the region to seek out the United States as a counterweight to China’s expansionist moves in the contested waterway.Two Pentagon officials said the deal will permit the U.S. Navy to operate P-8 Poseidon planes from Singapore’s airfields, providing Washington with a strategic vantage point to track Beijing’s military activity in the South China Sea, which is home to more than $5 trillion worth of commercial shipping.
Source: Singapore Approves U.S. Surveillance Flights | Foreign Policy
That’s not terribly surprising, as Singapore already lets the US use Singapore as a forward operating base for its LCS deployments to the Pacific.
What is interesting is that apparently Malaysia has extended a similar invitation for P-8 operations. Relations with Malaysia are pretty friendly, but they, like Indonesia, generally maintain that they are non-aligned.
-
USN moves to modify Super Hornet for Blue Angels role
Boeing will receive a contract to draw up the engineering plans needed to convert the single-seat Super Hornet into a configuration specific to the Blue Angels role, the navy said in a 3 December acquisition notice.The engineering work will support engineering change proposal 6480, which is entitled, “Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron (Blue Angels) Super Hornet Conversion”, the acquisition document shows.
The Blue Angels squadron is composed of a mix of one-seat F/A-18As and Cs and two-seat F/A-18Bs and Ds. The F/A-18A/B Hornets replaced the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk as the Blue Angels aircraft in 1986, and recently have been showing their age. Structural panels escaped from two different F/A-18As in aerial demonstrations a week part in late May and early June.
Source: USN moves to modify Super Hornet for Blue Angels role
There’s a real shortage of legacy A/B/C/D Hornets in the fleet, and something of a surplus of early block E model Supers, so the Blues would trade a wee bit of agility for a much younger platform.
-
The Final Countdown- Here, have the whole movie.
-
British Anti-Aircraft Artillery in WWII
Here’s a video the British released during World War II explaining AAA duty.
Recall of course that Britain was under nearly continuous air attack for much of the war. That meant a much larger investment in fixed and semi-fixed batteries than the US made. The mount shown appears to be the Vickers 4.5” QF gun, itself an adaptation of a dual purpose naval gun. The predictor appears to be the Vickers Type 10. The narrative alludes to radar, but for security reasons, doesn’t specify it.
Interestingly, while the 4.5” QF was an excellent gun, it began the war with rather sub-par ammunition. The Type 199 had an igniferous time fuse. That is, a burning powder train was used for the time delay. But since altitude effects burn rate, it was a less than wholly satisfactory fuse. A later mechanical time fuse and fuse setter were adopted as soon as possible. Oddly, it doesn’t appear a VT proximity fuse was ever adopted for the 4.5” QF, though VT fuses were used in other similar British AAA guns.
The US and most other nations pretty much abandoned AAA guns as soon as guided missiles became available in the 1950s.
The Russians and their client states, however, did not. I was chatting with a friend about this, and since whenever I go to the effort of writing, I think you should benefit, here’s part of the conversation:
The commies sure loved them LOTS of AA guns. I mean, LOTS.
Why the affinity for them?
They’re relatively cheap. And quite effective. Look at airplane losses in Vietnam, guns were far and away deadlier than SAMs.
I’d have to double check, but I think guns even took down more planes in Desert Storm than missiles.*
Lots of medium caliber guns (23-57mm) effectively deny the airspace below 10,000ft. Which incidentally means you’re pushed into the prime SAM engagement envelope. Which, you then have to spend a good part of the initial air campaign suppressing the SAM systems, and not striking the targets you want.
The first two nights of Desert Storm, the Navy and AF and RAF used low level tactics to avoid SAMs. And the losses were quite heavy. And virtually all to guns. They switched to medium altitude after that, reasoning it was easier to jam, suppress and avoid SAMs than to give up a $40 million jet to a cheap ass gun.
*Our friend Robin has an analysis of lost and damaged coalition aircraft in Desert Storm.
-
Rangers Lead the Way : The Other McCain
COLUMBUS, GeorgiaFriday morning was cold, and our family arrived at Hurley Hill in three cars. My wife and I had Kennedy and Reagan with us. Emerson rode with Bob’s girlfriend Johanna. Jim and Jeff had ridden down with Matt, a boyhood friend of Bob and Jim’s. We had more than an hour to wait before the graduation ceremony for Ranger school Class 1-116 began.
Hurley Hill is named in honor of Sergeant-Major Pat Hurley, who was killed during Operation Desert Storm. The hill overlooks Victory Pond, where graduation ceremonies are held for Ranger School, “an intense 61-day combat leadership course oriented toward small-unit tactics”:It has been called the “toughest combat course in the world” and “is the most physically and mentally demanding leadership school the Army has to offer.”Graduation ceremonies feature a “Rangers in Action” demonstration — rappeling, helicopters, explosions, hand-to-hand combat — that is very impressive.
The demands of Ranger School are extreme. Our son Bob was among 90 graduates in a class that had begun with 350 men, and the attrition rate of more than 70 percent came this close to stopping Bob. He made it through Camp Darby with flying colors, but had to “recycle” Mountain Phase because of negative “peer reviews.” This news caused much stress and prayer for us, especially for my wife.
Source: Rangers Lead the Way : The Other McCain
Congratulations to SPC Bob McCain on graduating Ranger School and earning the Ranger tab. Best wishes in future assignments.
-
Good Question, PopMech- Why isn’t the US buying the Brimstone Missile?
I mean, it’s in production, it has seen combat service, and it works quite well.
This counts as your Daily Dose of Splodey.
-
Capt. James Kirk commands U.S. Navy’s largest destroyer ever on maiden voyage – National | Globalnews.ca
BATH, Maine (AP) — The largest destroyer ever built for the U.S. Navy headed out to sea for the first time Monday, departing from shipbuilder Bath Iron Works and carefully navigating the winding Kennebec River before reaching the open ocean where the ship will undergo sea trials.More than 200 shipbuilders, sailors and residents gathered to watch as the futuristic 600-foot, 15,000-ton USS Zumwalt glided past Fort Popham, accompanied by tugboats.
“Destroyer” – thing is bigger than a Virginia class nuclear powered guided missile cruiser.
There’s video at the link.
