More in the USS Fitzgerald Investigation

In my previous post describing the damage control efforts post collision, I shared a document.  As we wait and pray for news of the USS John S. McCain,* I want to clarify some potential misunderstandings.  I've seen this article from American Greatness by Angelo Codevilla making the rounds on Facebook and other social media.  It's…

In my previous post describing the damage control efforts post collision, I shared a document. 

As we wait and pray for news of the USS John S. McCain,* I want to clarify some potential misunderstandings.  I've seen this article from American Greatness by Angelo Codevilla making the rounds on Facebook and other social media.  It's garbage. 

What was released was a Line of Duty (LOD) investigation. Any time there is a death or serious injury of a service member, an LOD is conducted to determine if the death or injury was in connection with the service member's duty, or if it was a result of the service member's misconduct. The scope of an LOD is thus quite limited. For instance, the report didn't focus on the events prior to the collision. Secondly, an LOD is not used as the basis for punitive actions under the UCMJ. It's primary purpose is to determine:

Determinations on the status of personnel regarding entitlements to pay during disability,
disability benefits, severance pay, retirement pay, increases of pay for longevity, survivor's
benefits, involuntary extensions of enlistments, dates of expiration of active obligated service,
and accrual of annual leave.

Separately, but concurrently, there is another investigation, known as a JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General's Manual) investigation. The Navy describes a JAGMAN investigation:

 Almost every naval officer will have contact with an administrative investigation (commonly referred to as a JAGMAN investigation) during their military career, either as an investigating officer or as a convening authority. The basic regulations governing such investigations are contained in the Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN). The primary purpose of an administrative investigation is to provide the convening authority and reviewing authorities with information regarding a specific incident which occurs in the Department of the Navy. These officials will then make decisions and take appropriate action based upon the information contained within the investigative report.

The JAGMAN investigation, unlike the LOD, is far more wide-ranging, covering the totality of an incident. 

Furthermore, the Navy is, I believe, concurrently conducting a Board of Inquiry. 

The command triad, and several others have already been relieved of duty on Fitzgerald. That is an administrative action. 

Eventually, the JAGMAN and BoI results will be published. Those bearing responsibility will be held accountable, still face the possibility of punishment under the UCMJ, which can range from a verbal admonition to a full blown General Court Martial. 

Spreading silly cover up conspiracies helps no one. Be patient. 

*Named not for the current US Senator, but rather for his father and grandfather.

Tags:

Responses to “More in the USS Fitzgerald Investigation”

  1. dhmosquito

    Angelo Codevilla: “Is he an admiral’s son, whose misdeeds are being buried as was John McCain’s responsibility in 1967 for starting the fire that killed 137 men on the USS Forrestal by giving his airplane’s engine a flaming “wet” start?”
    I do not understand this claim, which I have recently seen in e-mailings as well. I think the story about McCain causing the Forrestal disaster is incorrect. The Wikipedia article about the 1967 Forrestal incident has a diagram of the spotted aircraft on the flight deck at the time of the conflagration and if the diagram is correct, McCain’s A-4 is on the port side aft on the deck edge. His aircraft is oriented so that its exhaust is pointed out to sea. The ZUNI that fired is supposedly on an F-4B on the opposite (starboard) deck side, so I cannot see how any “Flaming ‘wet’ start” (whatever that is) of the A-4’s J52 could have initiated a ZUNI launch. I understand that ZUNIs had a checkered safety record in any event.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CVA-59_fire_aft_deck_plan.png
    Perhaps the Wiki diagram is not accurate. I don’t have the Freeman book on the incident but I think the story is a military “urban legend.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire
    Supposedly these incidents (including disasters on Oriskany and Enterprise) helped motivate the Insensitive Munitions Program for the Navy.
    chuck

    Like

  2. CTII Raven

    Some brain deads on that site – as for The Forrestal incident, the “stories” are pure, unadulterated 100% Bull Shit

    Like

  3. LT Rusty

    dhmosquito- ORISKANY’s fire had nothing to do with HERO or anything. It was a flare whose pin got pulled without anyone noticing, and then tossed into a locker.

    Like

Leave a comment