Combat Hammer versus small boat swarms

So, I stumbled across this interesting, but rather poorly written, account of using the A-10 Warthog to attack swarms of small boats. About 35 local boat captains simulated swarming attack maneuvers in fishing boats rigged with machine guns while fighter jets, attack helicopters, and the A-10 "Warthog" simulated attacks from above in Florida’s Choctawhatchee Bay.…

So, I stumbled across this interesting, but rather poorly written, account of using the A-10 Warthog to attack swarms of small boats.

About 35 local boat captains simulated swarming attack maneuvers in fishing boats rigged with machine guns while fighter jets, attack helicopters, and the A-10 "Warthog" simulated attacks from above in Florida’s Choctawhatchee Bay.

The Air Force at Eglin Air Force Base organized the simulation, called Combat Hammer, to address one of the more pressing threats to the US Navy: attacks from swarming fast-attack craft.

In the Persian Gulf, Iran has repeatedly used small, agile attack craft to harass US Navy ships in encounters that could lead to a broader conflict in a moment’s notice.

US Navy ships have gone as far as to fire warning shots at approaching vessels, but that was before Iranian-backed Houthi militants used a suicide boat laden with explosives to kill two aboard a Saudi navy vessel off the coast of Yemen.

Contracting with local boat owners, and visually modifying them with simulated machine guns was pretty innovative.

170206-F-GY014-020

After working with those, a live fire portion of the evaluation was conducted using unmanned target boats.

Combat Hammer is the program code name for the Weapon System Evaluation Program for air to ground weapons. It is run by the 53rd Weapons Evaluation Group based at Tyndall AFB in Florida. 170206-F-GY014-025

Essentially, after Development Test and Evaluation, and Operational Test and Evaluation, WSEP does Follow On Test and Evaluation.  FOT&E is where the tactics, techniques and  procedures to use a weapon, or a family of weapons, or even complete weapon systems, are evaluated, to give operational squadrons guidance on how best to address a given threat.

Rather than using their own fleet of aircraft, Combat Hammer hosts detachments from the squadrons that will actually be using the weapons and tactics.  Thus, in addition to  validating TTPs, the squadrons get valuable experience using weapons on a fantastic  range complex, training they might not ordinarily be able to conduct.

Combat Hammer hosts virtually every type of USAF aircraft with an air to ground capability. In addition, friendly foreign air forces are often invited to participate.

On the air to air side, WSEP also runs Combat Archer, and even has the little discussed Combat Sledgehammer, which develops TTPs for nuclear weapons.

Tags:

Responses to “Combat Hammer versus small boat swarms”

  1. Cannoneer No. 4

    Hard for me to imagine the Navy asking the Air Force for help against small boats.
    How many acres of sovereign US flight deck would a fully fueled A-10 need to fly?

    Like

  2. KenH

    They may have needed dental work after the exercise…
    Nevertheless, the Hog seems an obvious giant-can-o-whoopass for vaporizing bayliners and assorted plastic boats. It probably was never thought of before for the obvious NIH syndrome. Which aint new.

    Like

  3. John in Philly

    I used to think that a dodging small boat would be an easy target for fifty caliber machine guns.
    My change of mind happened during an annual two weeks on an FF and while watching the ship’s fifties engage simulated targets.
    When you look at the distances over water, the pitch and roll of the ship, and the bullet flight times, it is no easy task.
    It was a sobering day.

    Like

  4. timactual

    It’s hard enough hitting moving targets on solid ground. There is a good reason bolt action weapons are obsolete.

    Like

  5. Chris Green

    Navalized A10 and/or OV 10 x using Hellfire missiles off LHD’s makes a ton of sense.

    Like

  6. Captain Ned

    I wouldn’t be surprised to find that the A-10 is already properly built for carrier ops.

    Like

  7. Quartermaster

    Ned, I would very surprised if the A-10 is built for carrier ops. Particularly given the time frame of design. The 70s was not a good time for USAF-USN working together.
    I have no doubt that AC are good small boat medicine. Until, that is, MANPADS are taken aboard the small boats.

    Like

  8. LT Rusty

    Ned- A10 doesn’t have a hook, the nose gear would need to be beefed up and get a hookup for the catapult, and you’d need to figure out folding wings.

    Like

  9. Cannoneer No. 4

    Launch them with fuel and 30mm only without catapult, full throttle brakes on in to a 40 knot head wind. Let off the brakes and the A-10 should do off a Nimitz like a B-25 did off the Hornet.
    Recover them ashore.
    USNS Invincible could have used some A-10s.

    Like

  10. Chris Green

    It should be noted that outdated swordfish crippled the Bismarck…

    Like

Leave a comment