Apache!

Most of you are probably somewhat familiar with the origin story of the legendary P-51 Mustang. The British Purchasing Commission, desperate for fighter aircraft, approached North American Aviation about building the Curtiss P-40 under license. North American thought they could do better than that, and proposed an all new design. The Mustang, with the rather…

Most of you are probably somewhat familiar with the origin story of the legendary P-51 Mustang. The British Purchasing Commission, desperate for fighter aircraft, approached North American Aviation about building the Curtiss P-40 under license. North American thought they could do better than that, and proposed an all new design. The Mustang, with the rather anemic Allison V-1710 engine, was soon flying, and proved to be quite good at  low altitude.

Here’s where the story gets a little weird, and shows that even World War II procurement had its issues.

The Brits wanted more Mustangs. But they ran out of Lend Lease funds for the fiscal year. And the US Army Air Forces wanted to keep the production line running as well, for their own reasons. So the AAF decided they would buy some of the contracted Mustangs. The problem was, the AAF had burned through its allocation of funds for fighters.

What they hadn’t spent that fiscal year was all the funds for attack aircraft. And so, the AAF wen to North American, and asked for an attack version of the Mustang. Dive brakes, a slightly revised armament, beefed up wing and bomb racks led to the dive bomber version, the A-36 Apache.

 

Orders for 500 were promptly made. The next question was, what to do with them. Two groups in the Mediterranean theater were eventually equipped with A-36s, and served in the Sicily campaign.

One interesting aspect of the Apache was the armament. There were four .50cal machine guns in the wings, and two .50cal guns mounted below the engine, synchronized to fire through the propeller.

 

A36

The Apache was a capable, accurate dive bomber, but its Allison engine meant that its performance above about 12,000 feet was mediocre at best. Furthermore, its mission meant that it would spend considerable time at very low altitude, exposing it to light flack and small arms fire. And that was a real problem. The underbelly radiator was very vulnerable to damage. Any hit would almost certainly cause the coolant to leak out, inevitably leading to the loss of power, and the loss of an aircraft. Combat losses were quite high.

By 1944, the losses were such that it was withdrawn, and the ground attack mission was pretty much handed over to the Republic P-47, whose air cooled R-2800 engine was less vulnerable.

One unit of Apaches also served in the China/Burma/India theater as well, with mediocre results at best.

With only 500 built, the A-36 was something of a footnote to the legacy of the Mustang lineage. It was not a failure, really, but a stepping stone toward what would become the legendary Merlin powered Mustangs that would serve with such distinction.

The first half of this video follows the A-36 in the Mediterranean (FYI, the crews liked to call it the Invader, vice the Apache). The second half of the video is a fascinating look at Nazi propaganda celebrating war production. All in all, worth grabbing a cup of coffee and enjoying.

Tags:

Responses to “Apache!”

  1. timactual

    One thing that has always caught my attention about the Korean War was that P-51s were used as ground attack aircraft. You would think that after WWII, when all propeller driven fighters were on the way out, that the AF would have kept the P-47 for its ground attack role and dropped the P-51. I wonder how many pilots paid the price for that decision.

    Like

  2. Captain Ned

    Range. In the early days of the war, flying from Japan, the P-51’s legs meant at least you’d have aircraft over target with reasonable loiter time.

    Like

  3. Ron Snyder

    Never heard of the Apache before, thanks for the information.

    Like

  4. DaveP.

    Ernie Pyle mentioned them as ‘Mustang dive bombers’, which isn’t really inaccurate.
    I thought the deal had been the other way around: with early (pre-Merlin) Mustangs being converted to dive bombers after the Merlin Mustangs came online. Thanks for the correction.

    Like

  5. SCOTTtheBADGER

    In BRAVE MEN, Ernie Pyle writes about an Invader squadron. The pilots seemed to like them.

    Like

  6. Casey

    tim, it all goes down to cost again. A P-51 was much cheaper to buy than a P-47, and cheaper to operate. As the good captain pointed out, range was important too. 🙂 IIRC, the P-47N had extended range, but nothing like the Mustang or the Twin Mustang.
    .. If memory serves, “Mustang” was a British name choice, with the AAF bouncing between “Invader” and “Apache.” Mustang won out.
    As an aside the Brits called their B-29s “Washington” and their F4Fs “Martlet.” Silly brits… 🙂

    Like

  7. Captain Ned

    The P-47N had the requisite legs but, for some unknown reason, the P-47 fleet was mostly scrapped in toto after the war in favor of the P-51.
    Does the AAC/USAF “fighter mafia” go that far back?
    Also, somewhere around 1943 or so the US and the UK figured out that different names for the same plane complicated logistics, so the US used UK names on UK planes flown by the US (there’s a whole bunch of Spits and a few Mossies what wore the Star and Bars) and vice versa.

    Like

Leave a comment