XBradTC

Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

So says WAPO.  And the Obama Administration.  (URR here.) Actually, Drudge beat me to the punch in calling the CIA assessments "fake".  As with most of the agitprop produced by the Obama Administration and its minions, including sycophant mainstream media fops, whatever "truth" may be contained in these assertions is both debatable and nearly irrelevant.  

The article admits that the alleged Russian "hacking" of the DNC cannot be directly tied to Russia.  But, of course, the article states with near certainty that it was agents acting on behalf of Russia who were responsible.  While this may (and I emphasize MAY) be empirically true, the untold portion of that story is that many of these "agents" are also in the employ of the US government, covertly, and work for other entities such as Wikileaks, other foreign governments, or business interests.  That is, in the Black Hat community, how they make their money.  And they make a lot of it.  

And much more is left untold.   The hue and cry over Russia providing DNC e-mails to Wikileaks for release in order to influence the election neglects to mention that many of the Wikileaks e-mails regarding Hillary Clinton's State Department time show thousands upon thousands of leaks and compromise of classified information, and a trail of influence-peddling via the Clinton Foundation that would put any recorded conviction under RICO to shame.  It also fails to mention that Hillary Clinton expunged some thirty thousand such items of correspondence, directing that the unauthorized server on which they were stored be erased with a sophisticated application (Bleachbit) not readily available to you and me.  Despite the fact that this deletion was done AFTER that evidence was under active subpoena.  And all the while she acted the innocent bumbler whose knowledge of computers was rudimentary at best.  

President Obama, for his part, claims that Russian interference, if indeed true, somehow "crosses a new threshold".  Either he is startlingly ignorant Soviet Russia's intrusion in virtually every US national and Congressional election from the 1920s to the present, which I doubt in the extreme, or Obama is once again being deliberately misleading to the American people.  Such misrepresentation has been a staple of Obama's far-left Alinskyite propaganda campaign, and is indistinguishable from the lies told on his behalf by the beholden media.  (See: "If you like your doctor", et. al., under Obamacare affordable, or "Benghazi protesters", or myriad other such subjects.)

In a parting shot as he sees his "legacy" falling apart like wet cardboard, Obama wants to lend his fading influence to the idea that the 2016 Presidential Election wasn't really valid, and seems to intend a "deep dive" into the supposed Russian influence (at taxpayer expense, of course) to prove so.  O, but were he so interested in Fast and Furious, the rise of ISIS, Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation, Hillary's classified e-mails, the IRS scandal, the EPA scandal, the DOJ subpoena scandal, San Bernadino, Orlando, Fort Hood, Chattanooga, etc.  But alas.  On such matters as those, he is conspicuously uncurious, as is the Mainstream Media.  

So we will be told by Obama how Russia "stole" the 2016 Presidential Election.  Sans anything resembling proof, of course.  With CIA Director Brennan's seconding of the motion.   Trust anything they say, assert, or point to as salient fact at your own risk.  Because, though they and their fellow travelers decry "fake news", they are the very purveyors of the product.   And even after  the results of the 2016 election show so powerfully that a great deal of the American people are onto them, they seem intent on avoiding reality, and on trying to convince the rest of us to do the same.  

Oh, one more thing.  I don't believe Benjamin Netanyahu had to dive very deep to find Barack Obama's fingerprints all over US attempts to influence Israel's elections.   Seems ol' Bath House Barry and his merry band of Bolsheviks couldn't pick a winner there, either.