CNO Richardson bows to inevitable- Sailors to keep their ratings

So, last night, a NAVADMIN message started making the rounds on Facebook. And soon, CNO Richardson confirmed that it was genuine. From USNI News:   The Navy is performing a brisk about-face on a controversial plan that shelved ratings titles for enlisted sailors, according to a message Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson that…

So, last night, a NAVADMIN message started making the rounds on Facebook. And soon, CNO Richardson confirmed that it was genuine.

From USNI News:

 

The Navy is performing a brisk about-face on a controversial plan that shelved ratings titles for enlisted sailors, according to a message Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson that was set for release on Wednesday morning but was leaked on social media on Tuesday night.

The NAVADMIN message cancels a late September decision in which service leadership announced it would no longer address sailors by their rating – a more than 200-year-old tradition in which enlisted were known by their job title – and instead refer to enlisted sailors with the generic titles of Seaman (E-1 to E-3) or Petty Officer (E-4 to E-6).

That Richardson and the senior leadership at the Navy even considered this shows a stunning disconnect from the sailors actually on the deckplates. Instead, they spent far too much time worrying about SecNav Mabus’ insane social engineering priorities, and trying to eliminate “man” from all the various ratings and job descriptions, even as there was literally no on in the fleet, male or female, calling for such.

I’m no fan of Donald Trump, but this reversal is surely a concession that the Obama era is over, and that presumptive future SecDef James Mattis will have priorities other than tossing out over 200 years of tradition.

Does the Navy’s enlisted personnel management system need improvement? I’ll leave that for you squids in the audience to argue. I suspect there actually are some good ideas in the plan. But this whole mess could have been avoided easily. And wasn’t.

Tags:

Responses to “CNO Richardson bows to inevitable- Sailors to keep their ratings”

  1. ron snyder

    The tidal effects of Trump and his team are being felt. Early days, but the flame of hope is there.

    Like

  2. John Henry

    Yaaay!
    As a former Machinist Mate 1st, I thought it one of the stupidest things ever.
    I doubt that anyone would have problems changing the few that are not gender neutral already. For example Yeoman to Ship’s Writer or Clark, Radioman to Radio Technician and the like.
    No need to change Machinist Mate, Boatswain’s Mate, Electricians Mate etc as “Mate” is already gender neutral.
    I agree with Ron, early days but Trump is looking better and better every day. He may not have been aware of this issue. Had Crooked Hilary gotten in I think she and her Secs Def and Nav would have just said “Suck it up, we are not going to admit a mistake”
    I suspect that a SecDef Mattis would have been very aware of the issue and very aware of the unhappiness. I doubt he would have let it stand.
    Anyway, very glad to see the climbdown, whatever the reason.
    John Henry

    Like

  3. SFC Dunlap 173d RVN

    This seemingly parallels (w/o the gender aspect) how the Army refers to all NCO’s from SGT-MSG as Sergeant. Aargh!

    Like

  4. Casey

    John Henry, I seriously doubt Hillary would consider the change a mistake…

    Like

  5. LT Rusty

    @John Henry – technically “Boatswain” is a filthy sexist term as well, as “swain” is from the Old Norse “sveinn,” meaning “boy.”

    Like

  6. jackson

    Richardson admitted getting rid of rating titles detracted from accomplishing the Navy’s major goals with rating modernization, and that sailors pointed out there is a way to modernize the rating system while keeping rating titles.

    Like

  7. John Henry

    Lt Rusty,
    But “mate” can mean spouse. So a female boatswains mate could be the Boatswains wife.
    Or, in todays navy, so could a male Boatswains mate.
    John Henry

    Like

Leave a comment