Angle of Attack in the Age before Fly By Wire

Modern jet fighters today all, to one degree or another, rely on fly by wire technology to interpret the pilot’s control inputs, and move flight control surfaces to produce the desired maneuver. The most well known example of this is the F-16 Fighting Falcon.  But earlier generations of jets, such as the F-4 Phantom, had…

Modern jet fighters today all, to one degree or another, rely on fly by wire technology to interpret the pilot’s control inputs, and move flight control surfaces to produce the desired maneuver. The most well known example of this is the F-16 Fighting Falcon. 

But earlier generations of jets, such as the F-4 Phantom, had a direct linkage (boosted via hydraulics) from the control column to the flight control surfaces.

The aerodynamic forces upon an aircraft can cause planes to do things you might not intuitively expect, particularly at high angles of attack, or AoA. AoA is, very roughly, the angular difference between the mean chord of the wing, and the relative wind acting upon the aircraft.

A well known example of this was rolling the Phantom at high AoA. You’d think that you’d simply move the stick to one side to produce a roll in that direction. And at low AoA, that would be true. But at high AoA, moving the control stick to the left would actually generate a roll to the right. Roll authority at high angles of attack in the Phantom was normally exercised by using the rudder pedals. 

That’s easy enough to understand reading here on a page. But having to seamlessly transition from one way of flying to another while in a swirling dogfight was a real challenge. I had once former Phantom pilot tell me he spent his first tour learning to fly the Phantom, and it wasn’t really until his second that he became proficient at fighting it.

Tags:

Responses to “Angle of Attack in the Age before Fly By Wire”

  1. SFC Dunlap 173d RVN

    Reading the historical aspects of the Phantom I thought of another historical event…the most recent Army-Navy game. Did I miss a statement, or discussion of this historically significant event??? Richard E Dunlap USMA ’47 would have loved it!!

    Like

  2. juvat

    In the F-4, there was an Aural Warning that beeped in the headset as the AOA increased. Volume, Pitch and Frequency increasing along with the AOA. Never flew with a WSO, whose knees didn’t start coming together on both sides of the stick in direct proportion to that Warning. This formed a channel allowing only fore and aft movement of the stick. If the FUF (you can figure out the acronym, the last F is Front), wanted to turn his only option was rudder.
    Bold face for screwing that up which, by the way, resulted in an Out of Control situation, was:
    1. Stick-Forward
    2. Ailerons and Rudders-Neutral
    3. If not recovered-Maintain full forward stick and deploy drag chute
    There was additional guidance in the Dash One about this. If Out of Control below 10,000′ AGL-Eject.
    Fortunately, with over a thousand hours in the F-4, I brought back all my drag chutes.

    Like

  3. Xbradtc

    SFC Dunlap,
    While I was pleased West Point won, that was mostly because I got to give a hard time to some squids.
    I’m not a West Point grad, and frankly, the only thing USMA ever seemed to do was send me 2LTs. Just how enthusiastic about the place can you expect me to be?

    Like

  4. Quartermaster

    Brad, a lot of Army ossifers have just as much antipathy towards the tech school on the Hudson. The most popular snarky name I saw for the place was “South Hudson Institute of Technology.”

    Like

  5. CT II Raven

    QM, beats the trade school in the Rockies

    Like

  6. Joe Bar

    At 2:06
    “Have you got that picture ready, Dave?” LOL

    Like

  7. SFC Dunlap 173d RVN

    Copy all.

    Like

Leave a comment