I need an explainer on the electoral college. How is it that the person who got the most votes in this election is the one who lost?
— Rukmini Callimachi (@rcallimachi) November 10, 2016
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Callimachi has done some very good reporting on the fight against ISIS, so I won’t crucify her here.
But the fact that a byline reporter from the New York Times, a former AP bureau chief, needs an explanation of the Electoral College is, frankly, astonishing.
Both the Constitution of the United States and the whole collection of The Federalist Papers are available online, for free. That anyone can graduate from an “elite” university (Dartmouth) without reading, and understanding the Constitution is a severe indictment on our institutions of education. Heck, she graduated from an American high school. She should have learned it there.
And one of the most beautiful things about the Constitution is that it is quite easy to understand. It was written with a clarity that certainly isn’t found in current government writing. Probably the most confusing piece in the Constitution is the bit about capitation taxes, and even that can be puzzled out with a few minutes reading.
The shame is that we’ve taught an entire generation to have strong passions about the flaws of the Constitution, without having any grounding on why the Constitution was written the way it was.
And so we find ourselves today faced with the problem that Instapundit describes, where our “elites” aren’t elite, but merely elitists.
Leave a comment