Arming the Guard

Indiana Governor Mike Pence, in addition to a few other governors, has directed his state Adjutant General to authorize arming National Guard members at armories and recruiting stations throughout the state. You’ll note, until such time as they are called to federal service, Guard members answer to the state governor as the Commander in Chief.…

Indiana Governor Mike Pence, in addition to a few other governors, has directed his state Adjutant General to authorize arming National Guard members at armories and recruiting stations throughout the state.

Pence

You’ll note, until such time as they are called to federal service, Guard members answer to the state governor as the Commander in Chief.

It should be noted that recruiting for the National Guard is wholly separate from recruiting for the regular active duty and federal reserve components. That is, in my Army recruiting station, we had a mix of active and reserve recruiters, and the local Indiana Guard recruiter was just as much direct competition to us as the Air Force recruiter was.

Arming the local Guard Armory shouldn’t pose too many challenges. Armories by definition are a location for the storage of weapons. And most will have at least a handful of sidearms allocated. Having the duty NCO strap on a weapon makes sense. We’ve argued before that the duty NCO in most units in the active forces should sign for and carry (or at least be immediately able to access) a weapon.

The issue isn’t quite as simple as the governor issuing an edict, however.  Policy and guidance on such things as physical security for weapons and ammunition, rules of engagement, instruction on the law of self defense will need to be instituted. Will privately owned weapons be permitted, or only issue government property? If privately owned weapons are permitted, what types? Will recruiters be permitted to carry a weapon outside the confines of the recruiting station?

Will every Guardsman suddenly start carrying? Will they be open carried or concealed? Will the Guardsmen have to abide by relevant Indiana law concerning either concealed carry or open carry?

Believe it or not, most people in the service don’t spend a lot of time working with firearms, particularly pistols. The guy that enlists to serve as a supply clerk will, understandably, spend most of his time doing supply clerk stuff. In fact, recruiters, for instance,  simply don’t deal with weapons at all in a duty capacity. 

There will be consequences. There will be negligent discharges, and lost or stolen weapons. And sooner or later, a member of the armed forces will shoot an American citizen.  Planning, training, and leadership must address these concerns.

  1. Jay

    That’s why my kids were never allowed outside. Might scrape a knee or elbow. Couldn’t let that happen, now could we?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. SFC Dunlap 173d RVN

    I’m sure these things are being considered leaning and going forward. One factor your comment didn’t address is that in Guard exclusive facilities federal contracted, or constructed most likely fall outside the pervue of either a given Governor, or Adjutant General. All said, the bottom line is that no member of the Armed Forces of the United States working at a government facility should die defenseless in a terroristic assault. Let’s not hamstring either the ability of a SM to effectively defend with near useless ROE’s like only 5 rounds in a magazine with a second
    Magazine a “mandatory” 10 feet away. This is all to insane.

    Like

  3. NEC338x

    Well at least the governor is going to ensure that his NG respects existing gun-free zones.

    Like

  4. grandpabluewater

    “Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.”

    How many more dead enlisted people on bases and in offices of the disarmed Armed Forces must die before higher than higher stops saying that regulations that mandate failure to properly train and practice small arms proficiency (which includes safety, duh) by service members is is the reason that justifies their subordinates being lambs for the slaughter in “gun free” shooting galleries for the enemy, aka bases and offices rented off base.

    If you neglect your plain duty and persist with fatally bad policy in the face of obvious failure of the same, the enemy sees it as an opportunity.

    Yes, it will require work and expense. Defeat always does.

    Like

  5. Diogenes of NJ

    On the bright side, most of the nimrods who got us to this point are also disarmed and wouldn’t present much of a problem if someone were to come for them. The rest will probably scare easy.

    Like

Leave a comment