Sebastian Junger writes on the emotionally charged issue of PTSD and veteran suicide. PTSD is both a real issue for many, and a shield for others, and a club for yet more.
This paragraph leapt out at me:
What all these people seem to miss isn’t danger or loss, per se, but the closeness and cooperation that danger and loss often engender. Humans evolved to survive in extremely harsh environments, and our capacity for cooperation and sharing clearly helped us do that. Structurally, a band of hunter-gatherers and a platoon in combat are almost exactly the same: in each case, the group numbers between 30 and 50 individuals, they sleep in a common area, they conduct patrols, they are completely reliant on one another for support, comfort, and defense, and they share a group identity that most would risk their lives for. Personal interest is subsumed into group interest because personal survival is not possible without group survival. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s not at all surprising that many soldiers respond to combat in positive ways and miss it when it’s gone.
Simply leaving the military life is somewhat, if not traumatizing, certainly disorienting. I left the Army after my first enlistment to attend college. I had a much harder time coping then than I did when I eventually left the service for good. And I think part of that was because my last tour was as a recruiter, which by definition is far more enmeshed in the civilian community.
Like Sal, I have some issues with parts of Junger’s piece (and probably the same ones) but it is a great read overall. Spend the 10 minutes.
Leave a comment