,

Jag-YOU-ar

We’ve long admired a great many British aircraft, and disdained oh so many French aircraft. Which puts us in a bind, because we want to really like the Jaguar, but it’s half British, and half French.  By the 1960s, the costs of developing a tactical aircraft were so high that smaller nations struggling to maintain…

We’ve long admired a great many British aircraft, and disdained oh so many French aircraft. Which puts us in a bind, because we want to really like the Jaguar, but it’s half British, and half French.  By the 1960s, the costs of developing a tactical aircraft were so high that smaller nations struggling to maintain a realistic aviation industry decided to partner up with other nations in bilateral and joint projects. There’s a long, long, long list of projects that failed, for technical reasons, budgetary reasons, inability to decide on work share, and diverging tactical requirements. But a few programs have actually worked out pretty well. The Panavia Tornado comes to mind, as well as its successor the Typho0n. Among the earliest successful joint programs was a partnership between BAC and Breguet to form SEPECAT, a joint company that designed and built the Jaguar, a supersonic light strike/ground attack aircraft that served Britain and France from the early 1970s through well into the 21st Century.

The Jag is a single seat* twin engine supersonic low/medium altitude jet that was used primarily in three roles:

  1. Nuclear strike
  2. Close Air Support
  3. Tactical Reconnaissance

In spite of its sleek lines, what the Jag wasn’t was a fighter. While it could carry Sidewinder (or similar) short range air to air missiles, that was more a matter of self defense. It didn’t even have radar. Instead, it had a respectable (for its day) navigation/attack system to guide it to its target.

And to be honest, it really wasn’t supersonic, either. That is, with no external stores, and given time and altitude, sure, it could break the sound barrier. But down low, and carrying its normal war load, no way. But it was pretty fast down low, which was the whole point.

There are four wing stations for external store under the wings. There are also two wing stations over the  wing, rather unusually, where the Sidewinders were carried. There is also a centerline station. Typically, the Jag would carry two drop tanks under the wings, a chaff dispenser on one wing and a jammer pod on the other, and a couple of 1000lb bombs on the centerline.

In addition to service with the RAF and the French AF, the Jag has had respectable overseas sales, especially in India, but also in Oman, Ecuador, and Nigeria.

Grab a cup of coffee. This is a fairly interesting look at life in an RAF Jag squadron. At around the 15 minute mark, there’s some spectacular low level flying in what I suspect is Star Wars Canyon in Oman.

The French Navy also looked at a carrier capable version, but the word is that it was somewhat awful around the boat.

*There are also two-seat operational trainer variants that retain combat capability.

  1. jjak

    Love it for the UK. The French never really pushed export sales, throwing more support behind Dassault’s fully domestic line instead. That was probably a factor in choosing the Super Etendard over the Jag M for the Aeronavale as well.

    Like

  2. Bill Nance

    I was at Spangdahlem AB in the early 80s. There is nothing quite like the feeling you get when up on top a a fuel truck and you instinctively drop to the Deck, THEN feel the heat from the jet engines on your back, THEN look and see the “obsolete” Jaguar or Buccaneer that just dropped a simulated cluster bomb on you from 100 feet off the deck fading away in the distance and realize that these guys went THROUGH our CAP AND our ADA and “killed” your butt dead. (Cause 5k gallons of jp4 is a target no pilot could resist).

    Gave me a WHOLE new appreciation for the Mig23 and made me grasp just HOW bad it was going to be if that balloon ever went up, EVEN if nukes or Chem weapons were never used.

    The airplanes weren’t the greatest, The f15 beats the shit out of it in any area you care to name. But they got through. OVER….and OVER again. Cause it ain’t the airframe, it’s the driver. The airframe just gives him some some more wiggle room.

    Like

  3. Think Defence (@thinkdefence)

    You might like this

    Like

  4. xbradtc

    It was a coin toss between using that clip and the carrier clip.

    Like

  5. Think Defence (@thinkdefence)

    Imagine try to do that now, they would have to switch the speed cameras off !

    Like

  6. ultimaratioregis

    These days, it would shear off a landing strut in some pot hole, roll over and burst into flames….

    Like

Leave a comment