A question about Jesse Ventura, Chris Kyle, and the movie American Sniper.

You are probably aware that Jesse Ventura won a $1.8 million award in his defamation lawsuit against the estate of former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle. Kyle described a fight in a Coronado bar, without naming names, but subsequently in interviews named Ventura as the person he’d punched in the face. Ventura disputed this, and sued…

You are probably aware that Jesse Ventura won a $1.8 million award in his defamation lawsuit against the estate of former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle. Kyle described a fight in a Coronado bar, without naming names, but subsequently in interviews named Ventura as the person he’d punched in the face. Ventura disputed this, and sued Kyle. Before the suit went to trial, Kyle was murdered in Texas.

Lots of people got up in arms that Ventura continued his suit. All over the web there are posts about how Ventura was suing the widow. No. Ventura was suing the estate of Chris Kyle. That Tara Kyle happened to be the executor of the estate doesn’t mean Ventura was suing her personally. It certainly wasn’t Ventura’s fault that Kyle was murdered before the lawsuit came to a conclusion.

Ventura’s argument was that the publicity generated by Kyle specifically (and allegedly falsely) naming Ventura after the publication both cost Ventura opportunities, and boosted the sale of Kyle’s book, American Sniper. That’s considered a form of unjust enrichment.

I hate to say it, loathing Ventura as I do, but his case at court was quite solid, convincing not only the jury, but also the appeals court.

Now Ventura is suing the book’s publisher, presumably for unjust enrichment. One suspects Ventura’s case there will be every bit as strong as it was in the original suit. Whether the publisher settles or goes to trial remains to be seen.

So here’s my question. Will Ventura also go after the movie American Sniper? I suppose a case could be made that some portion of the success of the movie is due to the publicity surrounding Kyle and Ventura, though apparently the incident in question is not a part of the movie.

Tags:

  1. Shaun Evertson

    That’s a good question. Here’s another. If you made your bones as a big tough guy, should you even be allowed to sue over being bitch slapped in a bar fight? And one more. What percentage of Americans in the jury pool would be able to understand the (tough guys can’t sue) argument?

    Like

  2. Bill

    I remember this being mooted around somewhere else when the movie finally started showing previews. As I recall, the answer was no. I just can’t find the article.

    As long as the movie does not contain the same defamatory statements, I don’t think that he can get a second bite at it. It’s already been adjudicated and a number arrived at.

    Like

  3. beasn

    I still don’t understand how it can be proved that people flocked to buy the book because of that one little blurb.

    Like

  4. Casey Tompkins

    I don’t understand how that punk Janos convinced a jury that he had a good name to defame in the first place.

    Like

  5. MSG Harris (Ret)

    There’s a big difference being legal and being right. He’s despicable.

    Like

Leave a comment