Infantrywomen: What the Evaluations Are Not Considering | ARMY Magazine

January 1, 2016, is the deadline for the military services to integrate women into the Infantry, Armor, Field Artillery and Special Forces combat units. It is contended that this will offer an equal opportunity for advancement up the promotion chain to the highest levels of command for both men and women. Many tests, surveys and…

January 1, 2016, is the deadline for the military services to integrate women into the Infantry, Armor, Field Artillery and Special Forces combat units. It is contended that this will offer an equal opportunity for advancement up the promotion chain to the highest levels of command for both men and women.

Many tests, surveys and polls have been conducted during the past year, most of which have determined that physical strength and stamina will have to be gender-normed in order for the requirements to be fair and equally achieved; if they are gender-neutral, the standards will have to be much less demanding.

Test results and surveys have not been widely disseminated, but leakage seems to establish that men are five to six times more likely to meet standards being tested. This does not deny that some women are able to match the average male measurements, but very few match the higher scores posted by many men. Such findings are no surprise to anyone who recognizes that we have separate Olympic events for men and women, we have separate professional sports leagues, and we have separate world’s records for most everything requiring physical skills. The first woman to finish the Boston Marathon, who comes in ahead of a thousand men, also loses to a hundred or so men who crossed the line minutes before her.

via Infantrywomen: What the Evaluations Are Not Considering | ARMY Magazine.

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution quite clearly gives Congress the authority to put an end to this Obama administration silliness. Would that they exercise it.

Tags:

  1. JoshO

    This should be a priority, but have any of the congress creeps even mentioned it? It is a vital issue in and of itself. Also they should be digging in and marking their territory on every issue they can, not just to push back against the idiotic ideas of leftist but both sides of the aisle should be fighting for congress to have the bigger role it is supposed to have in balancing out the other branches as detailed in the Constitution.

    Like

  2. Esli

    I’m impressed that a retired GO actually came out and stated that female physical limitations would result in underperforming, with the unintended result that they would get poor evaluations, thus undercutting the very program designed to achieve parity in promotions for both genders. If he wasn’t retired before, he sure would be now.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. SFC Dunlap 173d RVN

    Impossible parity this.

    Like

Leave a comment