Leftists become incandescent when reminded of the socialist roots of Nazism – Telegraph Blogs

On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars. Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der…

On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars. Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der echte Sozialismus”: real socialism.

Goebbels never doubted that he was a socialist. He understood Nazism to be a better and more plausible form of socialism than that propagated by Lenin. Instead of spreading itself across different nations, it would operate within the unit of the Volk.

So total is the cultural victory of the modern Left that the merely to recount this fact is jarring. But few at the time would have found it especially contentious. As George Watson put it in The Lost Literature of Socialism:

It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too.

The clue is in the name. Subsequent generations of Leftists have tried to explain away the awkward nomenclature of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party as either a cynical PR stunt or an embarrassing coincidence. In fact, the name meant what it said.

via Leftists become incandescent when reminded of the socialist roots of Nazism – Telegraph Blogs.

Daniel Hannen is quite possibly the only useful member of the European Parliament.

I think he gives too much credit to his current opposition, and ironically, after telling us to listen to what Hitler said, refuses to hear what his contemporary political opposition says.

But the general theme of his piece is correct.

Tags:

  1. Gunny G
  2. Quartermaster

    You don’t like Nigel? 🙂

    He’s on the money about the NSDAP and leftists. They do get white hot over the facts and I have no hesitation about calling Hitler their best bud. The reaction is always entertaining.

    Like

  3. Esli

    Wondering if someone meant to say “incensed” but I am not going to the link to delve into why they used “incandescent” instead….

    Like

  4. butch

    “Other than the genocide, what don’t you like about Fascism?” – Jonah Goldberg

    Like

  5. xbradtc

    It’s a common enough usage in England. As in, incandescent with rage.

    http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/incandescent

    Like

  6. Quartermaster

    “Incandescent” gets used here now and again. I’ve actually seen it used more here than in the UK writings I’ve read.

    Like

  7. Quartermaster

    Under certain conditions, they don’t have any trouble with genocide either.

    Like

Leave a comment