By
·
About 2 hours ago, twitter exploded with discussion of a lengthy piece in the New York Times that admits that Weapons of Mass Destruction were indeed found in Iraq after the 2003 invasion. And of course, being the NYT, they have an agenda to distort the truth, and advance the political goals of their allies.…
About 2 hours ago, twitter exploded with discussion of a lengthy piece in the New York Times that admits that Weapons of Mass Destruction were indeed found in Iraq after the 2003 invasion. And of course, being the NYT, they have an agenda to distort the truth, and advance the political goals of their allies.
Rather than dissecting the piece, go read Gabriel Malor’s take on it at Ace’s.
Tags:
The NYT has finally admitted what I had asserted since 2003. They choose to couch it in lies and deliberate misrepresentations, but the FACT is that Saddam Hussein had a great many chemical weapons, and was looking to peddle them to terrorists who would use them.
For all that have clung to the ridiculous “there’s no PROOF!” nonsense, the proof was there all along, and actively suppressed. By the news media and the far-left Bush haters, not by the government, as the Times fabrication claims. To then claim that the Iraq War was launched to stop an active chemical weapons program is pure fabrication. What is also a fabrication is the statement that the warheads found in Iraq and the quantities moved to Syria are all “pre-1991”. That is most definitely a deliberate falsehood.
So when we get the apologies and the retractions?
LikeLike
What confuses me are the claims that the Pentagon withheld knowledge of the cache discoveries. Is that lies, or what else is going on? Rescinding a purple heart after its been awarded doesn’t seem too commonplace in my experience.
LikeLike
XBradTC 
Leave a comment