Harmonizing

When’s the last time you saw an actual P-51D firing actual .50cal machine guns? Well, here’s your chance. Parrothead Jeff sent this along.   You’ll notice not a lot of rounds were actually hitting the target. The best aerial marksmen in the world won’t do well if the guns aren’t “harmonized.” You’d expect the guns…

When’s the last time you saw an actual P-51D firing actual .50cal machine guns? Well, here’s your chance. Parrothead Jeff sent this along.

 

You’ll notice not a lot of rounds were actually hitting the target. The best aerial marksmen in the world won’t do well if the guns aren’t “harmonized.” You’d expect the guns in the wing of a fighter to point straight ahead. But in fact, you want them to point inward ever so slightly. Ideally, the stream of fire from all six guns would converge at a point 250 to 300 yards ahead of the fighter. That was typically considered the maximum range a pilot could effectively shoot in aerial combat in World War II. And of course, the idea was to have the greatest possible weight of fire hitting the enemy at once.

The mounts in the wing of fighters allowed both for the guns to be securely and firmly mounted, while also allowing the direction of the gun to be dialed in. The process was straightforward, if rather time consuming. The plane would be placed on the range with the tail elevated as shown, at the distance desired, let’s say 250 yards from the target. Then one by one, each gun would be fired for a very short burst, with the armorers noting the point of impact, then adjusting the guns until they were on target, center mass. After all six guns were adjusted, a final burst would confirm the guns were harmonized.

Each plane had small differences in tolerances, so each plane had to be individually adjusted. However, once the actual adjustments were known (say, for instance, gun #1 needs 4 clicks up and 7 right to be on target) each time the guns were removed for cleaning and reinstalled, the same clicks could be applied. An occasional confirmation firing would suffice to ensure the guns were still harmonized.

Note also that while the Browning .50cal is externally quite similar to the gun used by ground forces, it’s been designed to have a significantly higher rate of fire, about 750rpm, versus 500-550 for the ground version.

Even today, the guns of fighters have to be fired on an actual range to ensure they’re pointed where the pilot thinks they are.

  1. captainned

    Just what gov’t agencies does one have to pay off in order to fully arm a privately-owned P-51?

    Like

  2. xbradtc

    That question was foremost in my mind, but I’m to lazy to dig for answers. So, my choice was, talk about harmonization, which I understand, or think about the paperwork, which I don’t, and you not getting a post.

    Like

  3. Parrothead Jeff

    captainned – I believe you just have to get the .50 cals with the usual ATF paperwork and you can put ’em in the Mustang. The problem would be the FAA that won’t let you FLY with them installed. But that’s just my understanding 🙂

    Like

  4. captainned

    Oh, I get harmonization. Different pilots preferred different ranges. IIRC, Douglas Bader liked his harmonised suicidally close, like 100 yds or so.

    Like

  5. Casey Tompkins

    … One more reason to like the P-38! 🙂

    Like

  6. xbradtc

    The guns still had to be zeroed. And the differing ballistics of the .50cal and the 20mm made that harder than you would expect.

    Like

  7. Quartermaster

    BATFE is the anti-gun agency you have to bribe to own NFA weapons. A transfer tax of $200 each, and a record of your fingerprints have to be sent, then they interview you to make sure you can store them properly (in their limited minds).

    Like

  8. Casey Tompkins

    Really? The histories I’ve read all say* that the Lightning didn’t need its guns zeroed. Or is there a difference between ensuring the bullets go where the gunsight is aimed, and setting actual convergence, since the latter wasn’t necessary with the -38?

    You’re right about the 20mm vs. the fifties. Never thought of that. 😉

    Like

  9. Casey Tompkins

    Darn, the “*” footnote was *Those that mentioned convergence, anyway.”

    Like

  10. xbradtc

    They didn’t have to be harmonized. Just aligned straight ahead. Pretty much every weapon needs to be zero’d.

    Like

  11. Casey Tompkins

    Ok. I was getting zeroed and harmonized mixed up. 😉

    Like

  12. xbradtc

    In fact, given that the process is pretty much identical, they’re really the same thing. It’s just that because of the convergence used with wing guns, “harmonized” came to be used.

    Like

Leave a comment